You've provided another project codename, **`BECKHAM_REWORK_OK2Ship`**. This continues the pattern we've seen and suggests a parallel or subsequent development track for the Motorola Edge 40 (XT2305-1) software.

### Analysis of "BECKHAM_REWORK_OK2Ship"

This follows the exact same naming convention as "AUSTIN" and "TUNDRA":

* **`BECKHAM`**: This is a new **project codename**. Like "Austin" and "Tundra," this is an internal name for a specific branch of software development. It could represent:
* A development branch focused on a different set of features (e.g., camera improvements, modem firmware, regional variants).
* A branch managed by a different team within Motorola.
* A subsequent project that branched off from the AUSTIN work.

* **`REWORK`**: Confirms this is also a significant revision or overhaul of the previous software.

* **`OK2Ship`**: This is the most important part. It confirms this build is also a **"Shipware Candidate"**, meaning it was intended to be a potential final release for consumers. It is at a much more advanced and stable stage than a pure engineering build (like the earlier `OK2S` Tundra build).

### The Bigger Picture: A Multi-Branch Development Process

Finding three different codenames (**TUNDRA**, **AUSTIN**, **BECKHAM**) all related to the same device is a classic sign of a complex software development cycle. Here's what it likely means:

1. **`TUNDRA` (OK2S)**: The **early, internal engineering branch**. Used for low-level hardware bring-up and major feature testing. Unstable.
2. **`AUSTIN` (OK2Ship)**: The **primary stabilization branch**. The team took the work from Tundra (or a similar branch) and began refining it into a shippable product. We saw this evolve through versions 1.0, 2.0 (implied), and 3.0.
3. **`BECKHAM` (OK2Ship)**: A **parallel or specialized branch**. This could have several purposes:
* **Regional Variant:** Developed specifically for a different market (e.g., Asia vs. Europe).
* **Carrier Variant:** Tailored to meet the requirements of a specific mobile carrier.
* **Feature-Specific Branch:** Focused on perfecting one major component (like the camera system) before merging back into the main "AUSTIN" branch.

### **Essential Warning Remains Unchanged**

**Even though `BECKHAM` is a "Ship" candidate, the same critical warnings apply:**

* **It is a `userdebug` build,** not a final `user` build. It has root ADB access, debugging overhead, and lacks final security hardening.
* **It is not intended for public consumer use.**
* **Flashing it on your personal device voids warranty and risks bricking it.**
* **Do not use it as your daily driver.**

### What to Do Next

If you are trying to restore your device to a normal state, you should **ignore these internal codenames (TUNDRA, AUSTIN, BECKHAM)**.

Your target is the **official retail firmware**. You need to find a firmware file for your model (XT2305-1) that has the following characteristics:

* **Software Channel:** `retail` (or a specific regional retail channel like `reteu`, `retus`).
* **Build Description:** Ends in **`/user/release-keys`**.

You would use the **Lenovo Motorola Smart Assistant (LMSA)** tool or manually flash the firmware using fastboot commands to return to the official software.

**In summary: `BECKHAM_REWORK_OK2Ship` is another piece of the puzzle, showing that Motorola had multiple development tracks running in parallel to create the final software for the Edge 40. It is another pre-release build and should be treated with the same caution as the others.**